Andrea A. Lunsford och Lisa S. Ede: Om distinktioner mellan klassisk och modern retorik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v18i68.455Abstract
Översatt och med introduktion av Anders Eriksson.
Referenser
Introduktion:
Connors, Robert J. Selected essays of Edward P. J. Corbett. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 1989.
Connors, Robert J., Lisa S. Ede & Andrea A. Lunsford.”The Revival of Rhetoric in America”, i Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse, red. Robert J. Connors, Lisa S. Ede & Andrea A. Lunsford, 1-15. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1984.
Connors, Robert J., Lisa S. Ede & Andrea A. Lunsford, red. Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1984.
Corbett, Edward P. J. Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. New York: Oxford UP, 1965, 1971, 1990, 1999.
Crowley, Sharon. ”Current-Traditional Rhetoric”, i Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition: Communication from Ancient Times to the Information Age, red. Theresa Enos, 156-157. New York: Garland, 1996.
Crowley, Sharon. The Methodical Memory: Invention in Current-Traditional Rhetoric. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Univ. Press, 1990.
Dasenbrock, Reed Way. ”J. L. Austin and the Articulation of a New Rhetoric”, College Composition and Communication 38 (1987), 291-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc198711196
Edwards, Bruce L. ”Tagmemics”, i Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition: Communication from Ancient Times to the Information Age, red. Theresa Enos, 715-718. New York: Garland, 1996.
Ehninger, Douglas. ”On Systems of Rhetoric”, Philosophy and Rhetoric 1 (1968), 131-44.
Fafner, Jørgen. ”Retorikkens brændpunkt”, Rhetorica Scandinavica 2 (1997), 7-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52610/SXJJ2879
Fleming, David. ”Rhetoric Revival or Process Revolution? Revisiting the Emergence of Composition as a Discipline,” i Renewing Rhetoric’s Relation to Composition Essays in Honor of Theresa Jarnagin Enos, red. Borrowman, Brown & Miller, 25-52. New York: Routledge, 2009.
Grimaldi, William M. A. Aristotle, Rhetoric I: A Commentary. Bronx, N.Y.: Fordham Univ. Press, 1980.
Grimaldi, William M. A. Studies in the Philosophy of Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Wiesbaden: Frans Steiner Verlag, 1972.
Knoblauch, C.H. & Lil Brannon. Rhetorical traditions and the teaching of writing. Upper Montclair, N.J.: Boynton/Cook Publishers, 1984.
Kock, Christian. ”Retorikkens identitet”, Rhetorica Scandinavica 1 (1997), 10-19.
Lamb, Catherine E. “Beyond Argument in Feminist Composition”, College Composition and Communication 42 (1991), 11-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc19918937
Lunsford, Andrea A. ”Aristotelian Rhetoric: Let’s Get Back to the Classics”, Journal of Basic Writing 2 (1978), 2-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37514/JBW-J.1978.2.1.02
Lunsford, Andrea A. ”Aristotelian vs. Rogerian Argument: A Reassessment”, College Composition and Communication 30(1979), 146-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc197916236
Lunsford, Andrea A. & Lisa S. Ede. ”Classical Rhetoric, Modern Rhetoric, and Contemporary Discourse Studies”, Written Communication (1984), 78-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088384001001004
Lunsford, Andrea A. & Lisa S. Ede. ”Collaboration and Compromise: The Fine Art of Writing with a Friend”, Writers on Writing. red. Tom Waldrep. Vol. 2., 121-27. New York: Random House, 1987.
Lunsford, Andrea A. & Lisa S. Ede. ”On Distinctions Between Classical and Modern Rhetoric”, i Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook., red. Theresa Enos & Stuart C. Brown, 397-411. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1994.
Lunsford, Andrea A. & Lisa S. Ede. ”Collaborative Authorships and the Teaching of Writing”, i The Construction of Authorship. red. Martha Woodmansee & Peter Jaszi, 417-439. Durham: Duke University Press, 1994.
Lunsford, Andrea A. & John J. Ruszkiewicz. Everything’s An Argument. 6 uppl. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s Press, 2012.
Lunsford, Andrea A., red. The SAGE handbook of rhetorical studies. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412982795
Lunsford, Andrea A., red. The St. Martin’s Handbook, 7 uppl. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s Press, 2011.
Mral, Brigitte. ”Retorik i Sverige: En lägesbeskrivning”, Rhetorica Scandinavica 12 (1999), 44-50.
Walzer, Arthur. ”Aristotle’s rhetoric, dialogism, and contemporary research in composition”, Rhetoric Review16 (1997), 45-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07350199709389079
Welch, Kathleen E. ”A Critique of Classical Rhetoric: The Contemporary Appropriation of Ancient Discourse”, Rhetoric Review 6 (1987), 79-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198709359154
Welch, Kathleen E. The Contemporary Reception of Classical Rhetoric: Appropriations of Ancient Discourse. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1990.
Young, Richard, Alton Becker & Kenneth Pike. Rhetoric: Discovery and Change. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1970.
Artikel:
Aristoteles. The Art of Rhetoric. Övers. John Henry Freese. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.aristotle-art_rhetoric.1926
Bator, Paul. “Aristotelian and Rogerian Rhetoric,” College Composition and Communication 31 (1980), 427-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc198015935
Bitzer, Lloyd. ”Aristotle’s Enthymeme Revisited,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 45 (1959), 399- 408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335635909382374
Brockriede, Wayne E. “Toward a Contemporary Aristotelian Theory of Rhetoric,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 52 (1966), 33-40. Omtryckt i Contemporary Theories of Rhetoric, red. Richard Johannesen, 39-49. New York: Harper and Row, 1971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335636609382755
Burke, Kenneth. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: Univ. Of California Press, [1950], 1969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520353237
Conley, Thomas M. ”The Greekless Reader and Aristotle’s Rhetoric,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 65 (1979), 74-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637909383459
Ehninger, Douglas. “On Rhetoric and Rhetorics,” Western Speech 31 (1967), 242-49.
Ehninger, Douglas. “On Systems of Rhetoric,” Philosophy and Rhetoric 1 (1968), 131-44. Omtryckt i Contemporary Rhetoric, red. Douglas Ehninger, 49-58. Glenview, Ill: Scott, Foresman and Co., 1972.
Ehninger, Douglas. ”Campbell, Blair, and Whately Revisited,” Southern Speech Journal 28, (1963), 169-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10417946309371685
Ehninger, Douglas. ”George Campbell and the Revolution in Inventional Theory,” Southern Speech Journal 15 (1950), 270-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10417945009371140
Fogarty, Daniel S.J. Roots for a New Rhetoric. New York: Russel and Russel, 1959.
Gage, John. ”An Adequate Epistemology for Composition: Classical and Modern Perspectives”, i Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse, red. Robert J, Connors, Lisa S. Ede & Andrea A. Lunsford, 152-69. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Univ. Press, 1984.
Grimaldi, William M. A. Aristotle, Rhetoric I: A Commentary. Bronx, N.Y.: Fordham Univ. Press, 1980.
Grimaldi, William M. A. Studies in the Philosophy of Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Wiesbaden: Frans Steiner Verlag, 1972.
Halloran, Michael. ”Rhetoric in the American College Curriculum: The Decline of Public Discourse” Pre/Text 3 (1982), 245-69.
Halloran, S. Michael. “On the End of Rhetoric, Classical and Modern,” College English 36 (1975), 621-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/ce197516969
Halloran, S. Michael. “Tradition and Theory in Rhetoric,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 62 (1976), 234-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637609383337
Howell, Wilbur Samuel. Eighteenth-Century British Logic and Rhetoric. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press, 1971.
Hughes, Richard. ”The Contemporaneity of Classical Rhetoric,” College Composition and Communication 16, (1965), 157-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc196521089
Johannesen, Richard L. “The Emergent Concept of Communication as Dialogue,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 57 (1971), 373-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637109383082
Johnstone, Christopher Lyle. ”An Aristotelian Trilogy: Ethics, Rhetorics, Politics, and the Search for Moral Truth,” Philosophy and Rhetoric 13 (1980), 1-24.
Keller, Frank & Charles Brown. “An Interpersonal Ethic for Communication,” Journal of Communication 16 (1968), 73-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1968.tb00057.x
Martin, Howard & Kenneth Andersen. Speech Communication: Analyses and Readings. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1968.
Matson, Floyd & Ashley Montague, red. The Human Dialogue. New York: Macmillan, 1967.
Ohmann, Richard. “In Lieu of a New Rhetoric,” College English 26 (1964), 17-22. Omtryckt i Contemporary Theories of Rhetoric, red. Richard Johannesen, 63-71. New York: Harper and Row, 1971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/ce196427022
Polanyi, Michael. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1962.
Poulakos, John. “The Components of Dialogue,” Western Speech 38 (1974), 199-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570317409373830
Richards, I. A. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1936.
Rosenfield, Lawrence W. ”Rhetorical Criticism and an Aristotelian Notion of Process,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 33 (1966), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637756609375475
Scott, Robert L. “A Synoptic View of Systems of Western Rhetoric,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 61 (1975), 439-47. Omtryckt i Contemporary Rhetoric, red. Douglas Ehninger, 448-53. Glenview, Ill: Scott, Foresman and Co., 1972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637509383306
Scott, Robert L. ”Dialogue and Rhetoric,” i Rhetoric and Communication, red. J. Blankenship & H. G. Stelzner, 99-109. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1976.
Simons, Herbert W. “Toward a New Rhetoric,” Pennsylvania Speech Annual 24 (1967), 7-20. Omtryckt i Contemporary Theories of Rhetoric, red. Richard Johannesen, 50-62. New York: Harper and Row, 1971.
Stewart, John. “Foundations of Dialogic Communcation,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 64 (1978), 183-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637809383424
Strother, David B. “Communication and Human Response: A Heuristic View”, i Rhetoric and Communication, red. J. Blankenship & H. G. Stelzner, 89-98. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1976.
Walter, Otis M. ”On Views of Rhetoric, Whether Conservative or Progressive,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 49 (1963), 367-382. Omtryckt i Contemporary Theories of Rhetoric, red. Richard Johannesen, 18-38. New York: Harper and Row, 1971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335636309382627
Walter, Otis. ”The Most Important Sentence in Aristotle’s Rhetoric,” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 12 (1982), 18-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02773948209390626
Young, Richard, Alton Becker & Kenneth Pike. Rhetoric: Discovery and Change. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1970.
Young, Richard. “Paradigms and Problems: Needed Research in Rhetorical Invention,” i Research on Composing, red. Charles Cooper & Lee Odell, 28-48. Urbana, Ill: NCTE, 1978.
Zappen, Frank. “Carl R. Rogers and Political Rhetoric,” Pre-Text 1 (1980), 95-113.
##submission.downloads##
Publicerad
Referera så här
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2025 Rhetorica Scandinavica
Detta verk är licensierat under en Creative Commons Erkännande-Ickekommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0 Internationell-licens.
Open Access; CC Erkännande-IckeKommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0
