Lag och institutionella strukturer i Coronakommissionens betänkanden
En retorisk analys av ansvarsprincipen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v29i90.361Nyckelord:
Covid-19, folkhälsa, Sverige, pandemi, TegnellAbstract
Under sommaren 2020 tillsatte den svenska regeringen en oberoende kommission för att utvärdera de åtgärder som vidtagits av staten, kommunerna och förvaltningsmyndigheterna för att begränsa spridningen av coronaviruset. Jag analyserar här den sjuttonhundra sidor långa rapport som lämnades in mellan december 2020 och februari 2022 som en retorisk båge. I rapporten konstitueras ansvar först som en strukturell funktion; därefter som en juridisk konsekvens; och slutligen blir ansvar en skyldighet för både kommissionen och dess läsare att inta en hållning av "epistemisk ödmjukhet." Denna epistemiska ödmjukhet dämpar formuleringen av en slutgiltig bedömning. Essän bidrar till den transdisciplinära forskningen om covid-19-pandemins inverkan. Vidare bidrar den till studiet av styrningsretorik i västerländska liberala demokratier, och utvidgar den kritiska forskningen om statlig auktoritets funktioner samt de expertssfärer genom vilka sådan auktoritet
Referenser
Ahn, J., Kim, H. K., Kahlor, L. A., Atkinson, L., & Noh, G. Y. (2021). The impact of emotion and government trust on individuals’ risk information seeking and avoidance during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-country comparison. Journal of Health Communication, 26(10), 728–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1999348
Allen, J. D., Fu, Q., Nguyen, K. H., Rose, R., Silva, D., & Corlin, L. (2023). Parents’ willingness to vaccinate children for COVID-19: Conspiracy theories, information sources, and perceived responsibility. Journal of Health Communication, 28(1), 15–27.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2023.2172107
Bernard-Donals, M. (2020). On violence and vulnerability in a pandemic. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 53(3), 225-231. https//doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0225
Burgess, S. (2020). On a different scale: Movement(s) in a pandemic. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 53(3), 232-238. https//doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0232
Ceccarelli, L. (2020). The polysemic facepalm: Fauci as rhetorically savvy scientist citizen. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 53(3), 239-245. https//doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0239
Cintron, R., Bleeden, D., & Corcoran, C. (2020). The demon Ratu Macaling brings disease and disaster every year in the rainy season. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 53(3), 246-253. https//doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0246
Claeson, M., & Hanson, S. (2020, December 22). COVID-19 and the Swedish enigma. The Lancet, 397, 259-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32750-1
Condit, C. M. (2020). Phronesis and the scientific, ideological, fearful appeal of lockdown policy. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 53(3), 254-260. https//doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0254
Dempsey, S. E. (2007). Negotiating accountability within international contexts: The role of bounded voice. Communication Monographs, 74(3), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701543485
Elers, P., & Dutta, M. J. (2023). Theorizing COVID-19 information retrieving from a culturecentered lens: Communication infrastructures for challenging disinformation. Communication Monographs, 90(2), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2022.2164321
Erdbrink, T., & Anderson, C. (2020, April 28). “Life has to go on”: How Sweden has faced the virus without a lockdown. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/28/world/europe/sweden-coronavirus-herd-immunity.html
Ganesh, S. (2007). Sustainable development discourse and the global economy: Promoting responsibility, achieving containment. In S. May, G. Cheney, and J. Roper (Eds.), The Debate over Corporate Social Responsibility (379-390). Oxford University Press.
Gibson, T. A., Letiecq, B. L., Finkelstein, J. H. (2023). Good trouble in the time of COVID-19. Health Communication, 38(2), 416-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1957214
Guttman, N., & Lev, E. (2021). Ethical issues in COVID-19 communication to mitigate the pandemic: Dilemmas and practical implications. Health Communication, 36(1), 116-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1847439
Kennedy, M. J. (2020). On breath and Blackness: Living and dying in the wake of the virus. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 53(3), 286–292. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0286
Levy, N. (2023). Too humble for words. Philosophical Studies, 180, 3141-3160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-023-02031-4
Mazzocchi, F. (2021). Drawing lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic: Science and epistemic humility should go together. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 43(92). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00449-9
Milne, R. (2020, September 10). Anders Tegnell and the Swedish covid experiment. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/5cc92d45-fbdb-43b7-9c66-26501693a371
Pollock, J.C., Crowley, M., Govindarajan, S., Lewis, A., Marta, A., Purandare, R., Sparano, J.N. (2024). US nationwide multi-city media coverage of COVID-19 responses: Community structure theory, belief system, and a ”violated way of life.” Journal of Health Communication, 29(4), 256-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2024.2324845
Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
Rains, S. A., Harber, P., Warner, E. L., & Leroy, G. (2022). Public responses to COVID-19 mask mandates: Examining pro and anti-mask anger in tweets before and after state-level mandates. Communication Monographs, 89(4), 539–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2022.2043555
Rose, N. (1996). Governing ”advanced” liberal societies. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 37-64). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Savage, J. (2020, June 19-25). A failed strategy. New Statesman, 33.
Sjölander-Lindqvist, A., Larsson, S., Fava, N., Gillberg, N., Marciano, C., Cinque, S. (2020). Communicating about COVID-19 in four European countries: Similarities and differences in national discourses in Germany, Italy, Spain, and Sweden. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.593325
Solvoll, M. K., & Høiby, M. (2023). Framing the Covid-19 pandemic: A case study of the role of Norwegian public service broadcasting in times of crisis. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 73, 6-27. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i73.131934
Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner. (2024, May 22). Municipalities and regions. https://skr.se/skr/englishpages/municipalitiesandregions.1088.html#:~:text=Sweden%20is%20divided%20into%20290,with%20responsibility%20for%20different%20activities
Tindale, C. W. (2020). The moral sense in the time of the recluse. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 53(3), 326-331. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0326
Wagner-Olfermann, E. (2022). Political leadership in transboundary crises, responsibility attributions, and the role of the media: a synthesis of previous research and theoretical extension. Annals of the International Communication Association, 46(4), 290-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2022.2120520
Warnick, B. (2008). Two systems of invention: The topics in the Rhetoric and The New Rhetoric. In A. G. Gross & A. E. Walzer (Eds.), Rereading Aristotle’s Rhetoric (pp. 107-129). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Weber, M.A., Backer, T.E., Brubach, A. (2022). Creating the HHS COVID-19 public education media campaign: Applying systems change learnings. Journal of Health Communication, 4(3), 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2022.2067272
Williams J., & Wright, D. (2024). Ambiguity, responsibility and political action in the UK daily COVID-19 briefings. Critical Discourse Studies, 21(1), 76-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2022.2110132
##submission.downloads##
Publicerad
Referera så här
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2025 Rhetorica Scandinavica
Detta verk är licensierat under en Creative Commons Erkännande-Ickekommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0 Internationell-licens.
Open Access; CC Erkännande-IckeKommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0
