Biopolitisk deliberation
Den færøske abortbevægelse som retorisk reproduktivt medborgerskab
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v27i86.303Nyckelord:
rhetorical citizenship, reproductive citizenship, abortion rhetoric, contre-conduit, Michel Foucault, social movementAbstract
En ny social bevægelse på Færøerne så dagens lys i 2018, da foreningen Frítt Val, der kæmper for fri abortret, blev stiftet. I denne artikel analyseres bevægelsens kampagner som en form og udtryk for retorisk-reproduktivt medborgerskab, eller hvad jeg med henvisning til Michel Foucaults forfatterskab kalder biopolitisk deliberation, og understreger hvordan institutionel magt kan forstås gennem modstanden til den. Gennem kampagner der fremhæver flerstemmige og mangfoldige oplevelser med abort, belyser Frítt Val den nuværende lovgivnings indskrænkende norm for reproduktion, og med afsæt i analyser af disse, plæderer jeg for at imødekomme Foucaults plads i retorisk tænkning, og hvordan begreber så som modhandlinger (contre-conduit) også bør finde vej i ind i retoriske analyser af sociale bevægelser.
Referenser
Beauvoir, S. de (1971). La liste des 343 françaises qui ont le courage de signer le manifeste «JE ME SUIS FAIT AVORTER». Le Nouvelle Observateur, 5th of april.
Beynon-Jones, S. M. (2013). Expecting Motherhood? Stratifying Reproduction in 21st-century Scottish Abortion Practice. Sociology, 47(3), 509–525. doi: 10.1177/0038038512453797
Biesecker, B. A. (1992). Michel Foucault and the Question of Rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 25, 4. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40237735
Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking. A rhetorical approach to social psychology (Second edition). The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Campbell, K. K. (2005). Agency: Promiscuous and Protean. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 2(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1080/1479142042000332134
Charland, M. (1987). Constitutive Rhetoric: The Case of the Peuple Québécois. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 73(2), 133–150. doi: 10.1080/00335638709383799
Condit, C. M. (1990). Decoding Abortion Rhetoric. Communication Social Change. University of Illinois Press.
Cox, R., & Foust, C. (2009). Social Movement Rhetoric. In A. Lunsford, K. Wilson, & R. Eberly, The SAGE Handbook of Rhetorical Studies (pp. 605–627). SAGE Publications, Inc.
De Zordo, S., Mishtal, J., & Anton, L. (2017). A Fragmented Landscape: Abortion Governance and Protest Logics in Europe. Berghahn Books.
Death, C. (2010). Counter-conducts: A Foucauldian Analytics of Protest. Social Movement Studies, 9(3), 235–251. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2010.493655
Death, C. (2016). Counter-Conducts as a Mode of Resistance: Ways of “Not Being Like That” in South Africa. Global Society, 30(2), 201–217. doi: 10.1080/13600826.2015.1133566
Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1343197
Foucault, M. (1984). The History of Sexuality. Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (2007). What is Critique? In S. Lotringer (Ed.), & L. Hochroth (Trans.), The politics of truth. Semiotext(e): Distributed by the MIT Press.
Frítt Val. (2017). Meining: Frítt val—Fyri fríari abort. Dimmalætting, 19.
Gaini, F. (2019). Altered Islands: Young Faroe Islanders’ Future Landscapes. Suomen Antropologi: Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society, 43(4), 3–18. doi: 10.30676/jfas.v43i4.73270
Hayfield, E. A. (2018). Family-centred work motility in a small island society: The case of the Faroe Islands. Gender, Place & Culture, 25(8), 1138–1153. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2018.1461075
Hermannsdóttir, T. (2022). Maneuvering in Silence: Abortion Narratives and Reproductive Life Histories from the Faroe Islands. Medical Anthropology, 1–14. doi:10.1080/01459740.2022.2115368
Howard, R. G. (2010). The Vernacular Mode: Locating the Institutional in the Practice of Citizenship. In D. C. Brouwer & R. Asen (Eds.), Public Modalities. The University of Alabama Press.
Ivie, R. L. (2015). Enabling Democratic Dissent. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 101(1), 46–59. doi: 10.1080/00335630.2015.994900
Kock, C., & Villadsen, L. (2014). Contemporary Rhetorical Citizenship. Leiden University Press.
Kock, C., & Villadsen, L. (2017). Rhetorical citizenship: Studying the discursive crafting and enactment of citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 21(5), 570–586. doi: 10.1080/13621025.2017.1316360
Kroløkke, C., & Hermann, J. R. (2019). Slægtskabsreguleringer. Feministisk retsretorik som analyseramme og dens potentiale for at identificere lovens performative effekter. Rhetorica Scandinavica, 79, 44–65.
Lundberg, C., & Gunn, J. (2005). “Ouija board, are there any communications?” Agency, onto-theology, and the death of the humanist subject, or, continuing the ARS conversation. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 35(4), 83–105. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40232610
Morgan, L. M., & Roberts, E. F. S. (2012). Reproductive governance in Latin America. Anthropology & Medicine, 19(2), 241–254. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2012.675046
McKerrow, R. E. (1989). Critical Rhetoric. Theory and Praxis. Communication Monographs, 56.
Pason, A. (2017). Phenomenon or Meaning? A Tale of Two Occupies. What democracy looks like: The rhetoric of social movements and counterpublics (pp. 107-128).
Phillips, K. R. (2002). Spaces of Invention: Dissension, Freedom, and Thought in Foucault. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 35(4), 328–344. doi: 10.1353/par.2003.0010
Phillips, K. R. (2015). The Event of Dissension: Reconsidering the Possibilities of Dissent. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 101(1), 60–71. doi: 10.1080/00335630.2015.994899
Roussel, N. (1994). Let Us Create the Female Citizen. In J. Kjær & J. Waelti-Walters (Trans.), Feminisms of the Belle Epoque (pp. 278–292). University of Nebraska Press.
Siisiäinen, L. (2019). Foucault, Biopolitics and Resistance (1st ed.). Routledge.
Lov om Færøernes Hjemmestyre, nr. 137 af 23/03/1948 (2005).
Overtagelsesloven, nr. 578 af 24/06/2005 (2005).
Roseneil, S., Crowhurst, I., Santos, A. C., & Stoilova, M. (2013). Reproduction and citizenship/reproducing citizens: Editorial introduction. Citizenship Studies, 17(8), 901–911. doi: 10.1080/13621025.2013.851067
Turner, B. S. (2001). The erosion of citizenship. The British Journal of Sociology, 52(2), 189–209. doi: 10.1080/00071310120044944
Turner, B. S. (2008). Citizenship, reproduction and the state: International marriage and human rights. Citizenship Studies, 12(1), 45–54. doi: 10.1080/13621020701794166
Wander, P., & Jenkins, S. (1972). Rhetoric, society, and the critical response. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58(4), 441–450. doi: 10.1080/00335637209383142
##submission.downloads##
Publicerad
Referera så här
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2023 Rhetorica Scandinavica
Detta verk är licensierat under en Creative Commons Erkännande-Ickekommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0 Internationell-licens.
Open Access; CC Erkännande-IckeKommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0
