Generational Accusations – Conflict, Emotions, and Youth Activism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v25i82.9Keywords:
Kategoria, rhetorical genre, public emotions, generational conflict, Greta ThunbergAbstract
Compared to rhetorical defenses the rhetoric of accusations has not garnered much attention from rhetorical critics over time. Two common threads in existing approaches to accusatory rhetoric are a link to an underlying affirmative motive and a view of accusations as a rhetorical genre. However, these threads have not been fully developed so far. This article takes its point of departure in Carolyn Millers rhetorical theory of genre and Celeste Michelle Condit’s work with angry public rhetorics in order to reveal the social motive of the accusatory genre. The argument here is that the main motive can be found in a desire for corrective action, but is further supported by a definitory and moral motive. This is then used as a basis for treating generational accusations as a specific form of accusation as well as analyzing it in relation to Greta Thunberg’s rhetorical accusations of older generations in the climate change debate.
References
Beeson, M. (2019). Environmental Populism: The Politics of Survival in the Anthropocene. Switzerland: Palgrave-Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7477-7
Benoit, W.L. (2017). “Criticism of Action and Character: Strategies for Persuasive Attack Extended”, Relevant Rhetoric, 8, s. 1-17.
Berry, W. (1971). “The One-Inch Journey”, Audubon, May, s. 4-11.
Burgess, P.G. (1970). “The Rhetoric of Moral Conflict: Two Critical Dimensions”, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 56(2), s. 120-130. DOI: 10.1080/00335637009382993
Charland. M. (1987). “Constitutive Rhetoric: The Case of the Peuple Québécois”, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 73(2), s. 133-150. DOI: 10.1080/00335638709383799
Condit, C.M. (2018). Angry Public Rhetorics: Global Relations and Emotion in the Wake of 9/11. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9909538
DiSanza, J. R. & Legge N. J. (2016). “The Rhetoric of Persuasive Attack: Continuing the Development of a Taxonomy of Attack and Tactics”, Relevant Rhetoric, 7, s. 2-16.
Fisher, W. (1970). “A Motive View of Communication”, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 56(2), s. 131-139. DOI: 10.1080/00335637009382994
Fisher, W. (2013). “Narration som paradigme for menneskelig kommunikation: Om offentlig moralsk debat”, Rhetorica Scandinavica, 63, s. 12-38. https://doi.org/10.52610/RUUV2761
Gardiner, S.M. (2010) “Saved by Disaster? Abrupt Climate Change, Political Inertia and the Possibility of an Intergenerational Arms Race”. I S. Skrimshire (Red.). Future Ethics: Climate Change and Apocalyptic Imagination (s. 83-106). London: Continuum.
Henriksen, L. (2014). “10 falske citater, som kendte bliver tillagt”, Kristelig Dagblad, 10-04. Hentet fra: www.kristeligt-dagblad.dk/danmark/10-falske-citater-som-kendte-bliver-tillagt.
Jamieson, K. M. (1975). “Antecedent Genre as Rhetorical Constraint”, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61(4), s. 406-415. DOI: 10.1080/00335637509383303
Jamieson, K. M. H. (1973). “Generic Constraints and the Rhetorical Situation”, Philosophy & Rhetoric, 6(3), s. 162-170.
Krogh, M.A. (2020). “Unge klimaaktivister: Vi er nødt til at se sorgen i øjnene”, Information 06-10. Hentet fra: https://www.information.dk/indland/2020/10/unge-klimaaktivister-noedt-se-sorgen-oejnene
Lund, M. & Madsen, C. (2018). “Retorisk forhandling af følelse og stemning”, Rhetorica Scandinavica, 78, s. 41-52. https://doi.org/10.52610/NUAZ8351
Lykkeberg, D. N. (2018). “Vores forfædre har ødelagt kloden. Nu skal vi rydde op”, Information 08-08. Hentet fra: https://www.information.dk/debat/2018/09/vores-forfaedre-oedelagt-kloden-rydde.
Lyman, P. (2004). “The Domestication of Anger: The Use and Abuse of Anger in Politics”, European Journal of Social Theory, 7, s. 133-147. DOI: 10.1177/1368431004041748
Millburn, K. (2019). Generation Left. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Miller, C. R. (1984). “Genre as Social Action”, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), s. 151-167. DOI: 10.1080/00335638409383686
Miller, C.R. (1994) “Rhetorical Community: The Cultural Basis of Genre”. I A. Freedman & P. Medway (Red.). Genre and the New Rhetoric (s. 67-78). London: Taylor & Francis.
Nielsen, E. B. (2018). “Climate Change Means Everything-Change: Apocalyptic Rhetoric as Diagnosis of Systemic Dysfunction”. I J. Rice, C. Graham & E. Detweiler (Red.) Rhetorics Change / Rhetoric’s Change (e-bog). Brackenberry: Parlor Press.
O’Leary, S.D. (1994). Arguing the Apocalypse: A Theory of Millennial Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.
Olson, L. (2011). “Anger among Allies: Audre Lorde’s 1981 Keynote Admonishing the National Women’s Studies Association”, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 97, s. 283-308. DOI: 10.1080/00335630.2011.585169
Pickard, S. (2019). Politics, Protest and Young People: Political Participation and Dissen in 21st Century Britain. Switzerland: Palgrave-Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57788-7
Ross, A. (2019). Finding Political Identities: Young People in a Changing Europe. Switzerland: Palgrave-Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90875-5
Ryan, H.R. (1982). “Kategoria and Apologia: On Their Rhetorical Criticism as a Speech Set”, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 68, s. 254-261. DOI: 10.1080/00335638209383611
Thordsen, S.N. & H.D. Sørensen (red.) (2008). Ondskab – et politisk begreb. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Thunberg, G. (2019a) No One is Too Small to Make a Difference. London: Penguin.
Thunberg, G. (2019b). “Transcript: Greta Thunberg’s Speech at The U.N. Climate Action Summit”, NPR, 23-09. Hentet fra: www.npr.org/2019/09/23/763452863/transcript-greta-thunbergs-speech-at-the-u-n-climate-action-summit.
Ware, B L. & W.A. Linkugel (1973). “They Spoke in Defense of Themselves: On the Generic Criticism of Apologia”, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59(3), s. 273-283. DOI: 10.1080/00335637309383176
Wever, A.D. & K. Gantois (2019). Vi er klimaet: Et brev til verden. Aarhus: Straarup & co.
Wright, E.A. (2019). “’The Caprices of an Undisciplined Fancy’: Using Blame to Negotiate the ‘betweens’ of Ethos via the Epideictic”, Rhetoric Review, 38(3), s. 271-284. DOI: 10.1080/07350198.2019.1618157.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Open Access; CC Erkännande-IckeKommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0
