Hume’s ‘Higher Rhetoric’ – a Perspective

Authors

  • Ingmar Meland Oslo Metropolitan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v22i78.42

Keywords:

David Hume, philosophy, the history of ­rhetoric, rhetorical anthropology, deliberative rhetoric, stilus gravis

Abstract

Our understanding of David Hume’s philosophy in general can benefit from being read as part of the history of rhetoric. In connection with some relatively new studies of Hume, the article tries to show what makes Hume’s philosophy relevant to political rhetoric today. The starting point is that Hume’s Treatise can be regarded as a rhetorical anthropology and that this anthropology gives us keys to a reading of the essay Of Eloquence. By separating Hume’s rhetorical anthropology from his own philosophical rhetoric, as well as from his views on the art of everyday conversation and political rhetoric, his use of ancient forms and his retrenchment of the gentleman’s ideals of his time are highlighted to offer a fresh perspective on what these aspects of Hume’s philosophy might imply today.

Author Biography

Ingmar Meland, Oslo Metropolitan University

Professor II ved Oslomet – storbyuniversitetet og fagansvarlig for BA-emnet Retorikk og kommunikasjonsetikk ved Westerdals Institutt for kommunikasjon og design, Høyskolen Kristiania i Oslo

References

Box, M. A. The Suasive Art of David Hume. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1990.

Broadie, Alexander. A History of Scottisch Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010.

Fafner, Jørgen. “Retorikens brændpunkt.“ I Vad är retorik? red Kjell Lars Berge. Institutionens för nordiske språk. MINS 29, 7-27. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet, 1988.

Gross, Daniel M. The Secret History of Emotion: From Aristotle’s Rhetoric to Modern Brain Science. Chicago og London: The University of Chicago Press, 2006.

Hanvelt, Marc. “Polite Oratory: Hume’s Conception of Rhetoric”. Upublisert paper presentert

ved den årlige konferansen til Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference, York University, Toronto, 1.-3. juni 2006.

Hanvelt, Marc. The Politics of Eloquence: David Hume’s Polite Rhetoric. Toronto og London: Toronto University Press, 2012.

Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Redigert av David Norton & Mary J. Norton. Oxford Philosophical Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Hume, David. “On Eloquence.” I Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary. Edited and with a Foreword, Notes, and Glossary by Eugene F. Miller, with an apparatus of variant readings from the 1889 edition by T. H. Green and T. H. Grose. Revised Edition, 97 -110. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1985.

Kopperschmidt, Josef. “Was weiß die Rhetorik vom Menschen? Thematisch einleitende Bemerkungen.” ,I Rhetorische Anthropologie: Studien zum Homo rhetoricus, Red. Kopperschmidt, 7-37. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2000.

Krause, Sharon R. Civil Passions: Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation. Princeton og Woodstock: Princeton University Press, 2008.

Lindhardt, Jan. Retorikk, En innføring.” Oslo og København: Munksgaard/LNU/Cappelen, 1987

Lindhardt, Jan. “Kierkegaard og retorikken.” Retorik Studier 9 (1991): 94-102.

Onsberg, Merete. “Hume og retorikken.” Retorik Studier 9 (1991): 63-91.

Potkay, Adam. The Fate of Eloquence in the Age of Hume. New York: Cornell University Press, 1994.

Utaker, Arild. Å lese filosofi. Oslo: Solum Forlag A/S, 1983.

Published

2022-09-23

How to Cite

Meland, I. (2022). Hume’s ‘Higher Rhetoric’ – a Perspective. Rhetorica Scandinavica, 22(78), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v22i78.42