Making Angry Public Rhetorics Work Better for a Global ‘Us’

Författare

  • Celeste M. Condit University of Georgia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v22i78.39

Nyckelord:

anger, emotion, appraisal, action tendencies, 9/11

Abstract

In the twenty-first century, as throughout human history, anger has played a pivotal role in governance and international affairs. This essay contributes to the substantial scholarly literature on public emotion by summarizing an integrative analysis of public anger built both on multi-disciplinary literatures theorizing emotion and upon three case studies surrounding the attacks now commonly labelled “9/11.” Examples from the rhetorics of Osama bin Laden, President George W. Bush, and Susan Sontag illustrate the predispositional complex of anger well, because the elements of that complex are evident among all three rhetorics, despite the dramatic differences in culture, ideology, and positionality of the rhetors from whom they emanate. The essay concludes by urging the development of conditions and rhetorical practices that would enable global anger to serve its valuable adjudicatory functions rather than to reprise endlessly its function of rallying peoples to attack each other.

Författarbiografi

Celeste M. Condit, University of Georgia

Distinguished Research Professor at University of Georgia

Referenser

Ask, Karl and Pär Anders Granhag. “Hot Cognition in Investigative Judgments: The Differential Influence of Anger and Sadness.” Law and Human Behavior 31 (2007): 537–55.

Burke, Kenneth. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.

Chvasta, Marcyrose. “Anger, Irony, and Protest: Confronting the Issue of Efficacy, Again.” Text and Performance Quarterly 26 (2006): 5–16.

Condit, Celeste M. Angry Public Rhetorics: Global Relations and Emotion in the Wake of 9/11. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2018.

DeSteno, David, Monica Y. Bartlett, Joie Baumann, Lisa A. Williams, and Leah Dickens. “Gratitude as Moral Sentiment: Emotion-guided Cooperation in Economic Exchange.” Emotion 10 (2010): 289–93.

Hall, Todd H. Emotional Diplomacy: Official Emotion on the International Stage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

Bin Laden, Osama. “Interview by Jamal Isma’il.” From Foreign Broadcast Information Service. “Compilation of Usama Bin Ladin Statements 1994-January 2004.” FBIS Report, January 2004. Retrieved from “Secrecy News,” http://blogs.fas.org/secrecy/2008/09/bin_ladin_statements/

Bin Laden, Osama. “Interview by Abd-al-bari ‘Atwan.” From Foreign Broadcast Information Service. “Compilation of Usama Bin Ladin Statements 1994-January 2004.” FBIS Report, January 2004. Retrieved from “Secrecy News,” http://blogs.fas.org/secrecy/2008/09/bin_ladin_statements/

Huddy, Leonie, Nadia Khatib, and Theresa Capelos. “Reactions to the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001.” Public Opinion Quarterly 66 (2002): 418-450.

Labroo, Aparna A. and Vanessa M. Patrick. “Psychological Distancing: Why Happiness Helps You See the Big Picture.” Journal of Consumer Research 35 (2009): 800–809.

Lutz, Catherine A. Unnatural Emotions: Everyday Sentiments on a Micronesian Atoll and Their Challenge to Western Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.

Lyman, Peter. “The Domestication of Anger: The Use and Abuse of Anger in Politics.” European Journal of Social Theory 7 (2004): 133–47.

Lazare, Daniel. “The New Yorker Goes to War.” Nation, June 2, 2003, 25. https://www.thenation.com/article/new-yorker-goes-war/ 25.

Lawrence, Bruce, ed. and trans. Messages to the World: The Statements of Osama Bin Laden. Verso: New York, 2005.

Parker, Michael T. and Linda M. Isbell. “How I Vote Depends on How I Feel: The Differential Impact of Anger and Fear on Political Information Processing.” Psychological Science 24 (2010): 548–50.

Petersen, Michael Bang, Daniel Sznycer, Leda Cosmides, and John Tooby: “Who Deserves Help? Evolutionary Psychology, Social Emotions and Public Opinion about Welfare.” Political Psychology 33 (2012).

Petersen, Michael Bang Petersen. “Distinct Emotions, Distinct Domains: Anger, Anxiety and Perceptions of Intentionality.” Journal of Politics 72 (2010): 357–65.

Potegal, Michael, Gerhard Stemmler, and Charles Spielberger, eds. International Handbook of Anger: Constituent and Concomitant Biological, Psychological, and Social Processes. New York: Springer, 2010.

Rosenwein, Barbara H., ed. Anger’s Past: The Social Uses of an Emotion in the Middle Ages. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.

Sadler, Melody S., Megan Lineberger, Joshua Correll, and Bernadette Park. “Emotions, Attributions, and Policy Endorsement in Response to the September 11th Terrorist Attacks.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27 (2005): 249–58.

Skitka, Linda J., Christopher W. Bauman, Nicholas P. Aramovich, and G. Scott Morgan. “Confrontational and Preventative Policy Responses to Terrorism: Anger Wants a Fight and Fear Wants ‘Them’ to Go Away.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 28 (2006): 375–84.

Small, Deborah and Jennifer S. Lerner. “Emotional Policy: Personal Sadness and Anger Shape Judgments about a Welfare Case.” Political Psychology, 29 (2008): 149–68.

Sontag, Susan. “Talk of the Town.” New Yorker, September 24, 2001.

Sontag, Susan. At the Same Time: Essays and Speeches. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2007.

Talbot, David. “The ‘Traitor’ Fires Back.” Salon, October 16, 2001. http://www.salon.com/2001/10/16/susans/

##submission.downloads##

Publicerad

2022-09-23

Referera så här

Condit, C. M. (2022). Making Angry Public Rhetorics Work Better for a Global ‘Us’. Rhetorica Scandinavica, 22(78), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v22i78.39